Prospect Baseline Profile

Luis Peña

MIL · AA · SS

Prospect Baseline Rank #14

Player Assessment

Current model read

Luis Peña combines a high-end projection with a wider-than-settled outcome range. Run (70) is the clearest carrying tool in the current scouting mix. The age-to-level relationship adds development value to the current performance.

Prospect Score & Development

71/100

Above average composite evaluation

Baseline

80/100

Central modeled outcome; separate from Prospect Score.

Confidence

94/100

High confidence

Evidence strength, separate from model risk.

Performance context

Model-derived assessment

60/100

Solid current production

OPS

Offensive impact.795 OPSBalanced offensive output

Contact19.9% KNear expected range

OBP

On-base foundation.380 OBPStrong on-base foundation

Scouting Profile

20–80 scouting scale

Overall

Hit

Power

Run

Field

Arm

Grades updated 2026-09-29

Supporting Evidence and What to Watch

Current model assessment

Supporting Evidence

The projection centers on 80, bounded by a 54 Floor and 83 Ceiling. The very wide spread keeps both the upside and downside cases relevant to the current evaluation. The supporting evidence is comparatively mature, so future movement should require a more meaningful change in performance or scouting information.

What to Watch

The next level of competition is the most informative test. At AA, age-to-level context is already helping the projection. Maintaining the same indicators against stronger competition would strengthen the Baseline more than simply repeating the current line in place.

Model factors and risk context

Model Risk Index0

Age to level75

Track record64

Data quality100

Risk, age-to-level, track record and data quality are separate model fields. A missing value is not zero.

Projected Outcome Range

Floor 54Baseline 80Ceiling 83

These are modeled outcome bands on the Prospect Baseline 0–100 scale, not guaranteed MLB outcomes.

Forecast

Statistical projections

No statistical forecast is published for this player. The current profile data does not include a documented rate forecast method, target population, or validation results.

Development Trajectory

Recorded Baseline assessments

Latest recorded Baseline: 80 on 2026-10-12 · Current Floor 54, Baseline 80, Ceiling 83

Recorded history Current Floor–Ceiling range

The chart connects recorded points only within the same model version and starts a new segment across gaps longer than 120 days. Routine point markers are suppressed; changes of 8 or more Baseline points are marked. The vertical whisker shows the current range and Baseline.

View recorded values

Date	Baseline	Model version
2026-10-12	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-09	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-08	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-07	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-05	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-04	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-03	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-30	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-29	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-25	78	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-24	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-22	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-21	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-19	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-18	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-17	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-16	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-15	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-14	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-09	77	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-06	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-05	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-03	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-02	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-01	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-28	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-27	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-25	86	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-08-23	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-22	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-20	86	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-19	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-18	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-17	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-16	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-14	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-13	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-11	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-10	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-09	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-08	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-07	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-05	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-03	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-01	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-31	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-30	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-29	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-28	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-27	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-26	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-25	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-24	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-23	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-22	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-21	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-16	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-14	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-12	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-11	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-09	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-07	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-05	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-03	80	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-01	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-30	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-29	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-28	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-26	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-25	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-24	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-23	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-22	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-21	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-20	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-19	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-18	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-17	83	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-16	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-15	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-14	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-13	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-12	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-11	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-10	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-09	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-08	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-07	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-06	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-05	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-04	83	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4

Development Outlook

Upside and risk

↑ Upside

The current Ceiling of 83 is 3 points above the Baseline. This is an outcome range, not a timed forecast.

⚑ Risk Factors

Model Risk Index: 0/100. This is a model measure, not a statement of real-world risk. Model confidence is 94/100 and is measured separately. Data quality and developmental uncertainty are also distinct.