Prospect Baseline Profile

Alfredo Duno

CIN · AA · C

Prospect Baseline Rank #10

Player Assessment

Current model read

Performance is doing more work than the scouting grade in Alfredo Duno's current evaluation. The 65 Performance Grade sits 10 points above the 55 scouting foundation, a large enough gap to change the shape of the evaluation. The age-to-level relationship adds development value to the current performance.

Prospect Score & Development

73/100

Above average composite evaluation

Baseline

80/100

Central modeled outcome; separate from Prospect Score.

Confidence

93/100

High confidence

Evidence strength, separate from model risk.

Performance context

Model-derived assessment

65/100

Solid current production

OPS

Offensive impact.899 OPSStrong overall offensive impact

Contact23.6% KNear expected range

BB%

Approach15.2% BBStrong on-base approach

Scouting Profile

20–80 scouting scale

Overall

Hit

Power

Run

Field

Arm

Grades updated 2026-09-29

Supporting Evidence and What to Watch

Current model assessment

Supporting Evidence

The projection centers on 80, bounded by a 59 Floor and 83 Ceiling. The very wide spread keeps both the upside and downside cases relevant to the current evaluation. The supporting evidence is comparatively mature, so future movement should require a more meaningful change in performance or scouting information.

What to Watch

A promotion or sustained success against older competition is the next meaningful checkpoint. At AA, age-to-level context is already helping the projection. Maintaining the same indicators against stronger competition would strengthen the Baseline more than simply repeating the current line in place.

Model factors and risk context

Model Risk Index0

Age to level68

Track record70

Data quality100

Risk, age-to-level, track record and data quality are separate model fields. A missing value is not zero.

Projected Outcome Range

Floor 59Baseline 80Ceiling 83

These are modeled outcome bands on the Prospect Baseline 0–100 scale, not guaranteed MLB outcomes.

Forecast

Statistical projections

No statistical forecast is published for this player. The current profile data does not include a documented rate forecast method, target population, or validation results.

Development Trajectory

Recorded Baseline assessments

Latest recorded Baseline: 80 on 2026-10-12 · Current Floor 59, Baseline 80, Ceiling 83

Recorded history Current Floor–Ceiling range

The chart connects recorded points only within the same model version and starts a new segment across gaps longer than 120 days. Routine point markers are suppressed; changes of 8 or more Baseline points are marked. The vertical whisker shows the current range and Baseline.

View recorded values

Date	Baseline	Model version
2026-10-12	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-09	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-08	80	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-07	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-05	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-04	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-03	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-30	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-29	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-25	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-24	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-22	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-21	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-19	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-18	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-17	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-16	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-15	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-14	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-09	79	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-06	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-05	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-03	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-02	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-01	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-28	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-27	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-20	78	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-08-19	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-18	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-17	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-16	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-14	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-13	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-11	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-10	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-09	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-08	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-07	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-05	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-03	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-01	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-31	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-30	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-29	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-28	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-27	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-26	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-25	79	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-24	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-23	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-22	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-21	76	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-16	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-14	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-12	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-11	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-09	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-07	74	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-05	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-03	74	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-01	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-30	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-29	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-28	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-26	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-25	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-24	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-23	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-22	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-21	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-20	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-19	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-18	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-17	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-16	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-15	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-14	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-13	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-12	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-11	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-10	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-09	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-08	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-07	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-06	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-05	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-04	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4

Development Outlook

Upside and risk

↑ Upside

The current Ceiling of 83 is 3 points above the Baseline. This is an outcome range, not a timed forecast.

⚑ Risk Factors

Model Risk Index: 0/100. This is a model measure, not a statement of real-world risk. Model confidence is 93/100 and is measured separately. Data quality and developmental uncertainty are also distinct.