Prospect Baseline Profile

Jesús Báez

STL · AA · SS

Prospect Baseline Rank #162

Player Assessment

Current model read

Jesús Báez's current production is forcing the profile above its original scouting foundation. The 64 Performance Grade sits 19 points above the 45 scouting foundation, a large enough gap to change the shape of the evaluation.

Prospect Score & Development

59/100

Developing composite evaluation

Baseline

73/100

Central modeled outcome; separate from Prospect Score.

Confidence

93/100

High confidence

Evidence strength, separate from model risk.

Performance context

Model-derived assessment

64/100

Solid current production

ISO

Power.304 ISOAbove-average game power

Contact16.0% KStrong contact signal

BB%

Approach5.6% BBNear expected range

Scouting Profile

20–80 scouting scale

Overall

Hit

Power

Run

Field

Arm

Grades updated 2026-09-29

Supporting Evidence and What to Watch

Current model assessment

Supporting Evidence

Prospect Baseline places the central outcome at 73, with a modeled range from 58 to 76. The width matters: the upside is real, but the profile still has enough unresolved information to produce materially different outcomes. The supporting evidence is comparatively mature, so future movement should require a more meaningful change in performance or scouting information.

What to Watch

The key question is whether the production forces the scouting view upward rather than drifting back toward it. Repeating the same performance against stronger competition or over a larger sample would strengthen the Floor and make the breakout harder to dismiss. That confirmation matters more now than simply adding another short stretch of strong surface numbers.

Model factors and risk context

Model Risk Index0

Age to level65

Track record69

Data quality100

Risk, age-to-level, track record and data quality are separate model fields. A missing value is not zero.

Projected Outcome Range

Floor 58Baseline 73Ceiling 76

These are modeled outcome bands on the Prospect Baseline 0–100 scale, not guaranteed MLB outcomes.

Forecast

Statistical projections

No statistical forecast is published for this player. The current profile data does not include a documented rate forecast method, target population, or validation results.

Development Trajectory

Recorded Baseline assessments

Latest recorded Baseline: 73 on 2026-10-12 · Current Floor 58, Baseline 73, Ceiling 76

Recorded history Current Floor–Ceiling range

The chart connects recorded points only within the same model version and starts a new segment across gaps longer than 120 days. Routine point markers are suppressed; changes of 8 or more Baseline points are marked. The vertical whisker shows the current range and Baseline.

View recorded values

Date	Baseline	Model version
2026-10-12	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-09	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-08	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-07	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-05	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-04	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-10-03	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-30	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-29	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-25	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-24	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-22	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-21	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-19	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-18	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-17	72	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-16	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-15	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-14	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-09	73	pbm_affbdd7c43a60c55
2026-09-06	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-05	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-03	77	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-02	77	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-09-01	78	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-28	76	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-27	76	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-25	73	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-08-23	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-22	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-20	74	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-19	74	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-18	74	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-17	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-16	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-14	76	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-13	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-11	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-10	75	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-09	72	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-08	72	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-07	73	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-05	72	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-03	72	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-08-01	69	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-31	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-30	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-29	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-28	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-27	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-26	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-25	69	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-24	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-23	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-22	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-21	69	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-16	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-14	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-12	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-11	69	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-09	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-07	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-05	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-03	69	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-07-01	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-30	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-29	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-28	68	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-26	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-25	70	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-24	50	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-23	56	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-22	56	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-21	56	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-20	57	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-19	57	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-18	57	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-17	57	pbm_6169a2220134229c
2026-06-16	57	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-15	57	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-14	57	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-13	57	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-12	57	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-11	56	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-10	55	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-09	56	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-08	56	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-07	56	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-06	54	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-05	54	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4
2026-06-04	54	pbm_145fdb152195dbe4

Development Outlook

Upside and risk

↑ Upside

The current Ceiling of 76 is 3 points above the Baseline. This is an outcome range, not a timed forecast.

⚑ Risk Factors

Model Risk Index: 0/100. This is a model measure, not a statement of real-world risk. Model confidence is 93/100 and is measured separately. Data quality and developmental uncertainty are also distinct.